Skip to content
CobbleStone Software discusses FAR Part 16 changes.
Sean Heck07/21/265 min read

Are Your Contracts Facing a FAR Repapering Bottleneck?

 

TL;DR

  • The Problem: Federal contractors now face increased scrutiny of non-fixed-price agreements that meet new FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation) Part 16 thresholds.

  • The Solution: AI-powered contract lifecycle management (CLM) software can identify impacted contracts, automate reviews, conduct sound audits, and streamline repapering efforts.

  • The Takeaway: Organizations that act quickly can avoid compliance bottlenecks and contract restructuring delays. 

 

Who Is This For?

This blog post is for government contractors, federal procurement professionals, legal teams, sourcing specialists, contract managers, compliance officers, and vendor management professionals responsible for managing active federal contracts and subcontractor agreements.



 

 

What Changed Under the July 15 FAR Requirements?

The July 15, 2026 enforcement date has passed, and the FAR Council's Part 16 Class Deviation under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) is now in effect. Fixed-price contracts are officially the government's preferred and default contract type, while certain other-than-fixed-price (OTFP) agreements now require additional justification and agency-level oversight.

The most important detail for contractors is that these changes are not limited to future agreements. Existing active contracts may also be impacted if they have 18 months or more of remaining performance, including option periods. Organizations across the federal supply chain are now reviewing active agreements to determine whether restructuring, renegotiation, or conversion to fixed-price models may be necessary.

 

Are Your Contracts Facing a Repapering Bottleneck?

Several aspects of the new requirements are creating immediate challenges for federal contractors and vendors.

 

1. New Thresholds Are Driving Increased Review Activity

Under the current requirements, OTFP contracts above certain agency-specific thresholds may require written justification and approval at the agency-head level.

  • $100M for DoD

  • $35M for NASA

  • $25M for DHS

  • $10M for all other federal agencies

As contracting officers evaluate their portfolios, many organizations are seeing increased attention placed on non-fixed-price agreements that exceed these thresholds

 

 

 

2. Existing Contracts Are Already Being Evaluated

One of the biggest misconceptions surrounding the July 15 requirements is that they only affect new solicitations.

The guidance specifically applies to existing contracts and orders with a remaining period of performance of at least 18 months, including options, as of July 15, 2026. As a result, agencies may review active agreements and determine whether additional justification, restructuring, conversion, or alternative contracting approaches are appropriate.

For organizations managing hundreds or thousands of agreements, determining which contracts fall into this category can quickly become a resource-intensive exercise.

 

CobbleStone Software's Buyer's Guide for contract lifecycle management software.

 

3. Manual Contract Audits Create Bottlenecks

Imagine attempting to manually review every active agreement in your contract repository.

Teams would need to identify contract type, remaining performance period, contract value, agency affiliation, amendment history, and associated obligations before determining whether further action is required.

For many organizations, manually auditing thousands of agreements is simply unrealistic.

Without centralized visibility, legal and procurement departments risk spending weeks - or even months - trying to identify potentially impacted contracts while compliance deadlines continue to evolve.

 

4. Repapering at Scale Requires More Than Spreadsheets

If agencies or prime contractors request contract restructuring, organizations may need to update large numbers of agreements simultaneously.

This process often involves:

  • Reviewing existing contract language.
  • Revising pricing structures.
  • Updating clauses.
  • Creating amendments.
  • Routing approvals.
  • Tracking negotiations.
  • Managing version control.

When handled manually, repapering projects can overwhelm legal and procurement resources and increase the likelihood of inconsistencies.

 

 

5. VISDOM® AI Can Quickly Perform 18-Month Lifecycle Audits

The first step toward compliance is understanding your exposure.

Using VISDOM AI within CobbleStone Contract Insight®, teams can quickly identify:

  • Active non-fixed-price agreements.
  • Time-and-materials contracts.
  • Contracts with 18+ months remaining.
  • Agreements requiring priority review.
  • Potential compliance risks.

Instead of digging through contract files one at a time, organizations can gain immediate visibility into their active portfolios.

 

 

6. Automated Threshold Routing Prioritizes High-Risk Agreements

Not every contract requires the same level of attention.

Automated workflow routing helps organizations flag agreements that exceed applicable agency thresholds and direct them through the appropriate compliance, legal, sourcing, or management review processes.

This allows teams to prioritize critical agreements while maintaining a consistent review process across the enterprise.

 

7. Mass Contract Authoring Helps Accelerate Repapering

Organizations facing large-scale contract updates need a repeatable process.

CobbleStone Contract Insight enables users to leverage centralized templates, clause libraries, standardized language, and automated document generation tools to produce contract amendments and updated agreements more efficiently.

For organizations updating numerous vendor agreements or subcontracts, mass contract authoring can significantly reduce administrative burdens while improving consistency.

 

8. E-Sourcing Compliance Begins Before Contract Award

Future compliance starts at the sourcing stage.

By incorporating spend justification, vendor responses, bid management, evaluation criteria, and procurement documentation directly into the sourcing process, organizations can help ensure fixed-price and compliance considerations are addressed before award decisions are finalized.

This proactive approach reduces downstream contract administration challenges and supports stronger procurement governance.

 

Why It Matters

The July 15 FAR requirements are now an inevitable part of today's federal contracting environment. Contractors operating under non-fixed-price arrangements may encounter increased reviews, additional approvals, restructuring requests, or pressure to transition toward fixed-price and performance-based contracting models.

Organizations that wait to identify impacted agreements may find themselves trapped in a costly repapering bottleneck. Meanwhile, organizations using AI-powered contract lifecycle management tools can quickly audit active portfolios, prioritize compliance efforts, automate contract updates, and respond to agency requests with greater speed and confidence.

Book a free demo of CobbleStone today to see how VISDOM AI helps federal contractors identify affected agreements, automate compliance workflows, and stay ahead of federal contracting changes.

Schedule Your Demo Today!

 *Legal Disclaimer: This article is not legal advice. The content of this article is for general informational and educational purposes only. The information on this website may not present the most up-to-date legal information. Readers should contact their attorney for legal advice regarding any particular legal matter.

FAQ

Which existing contracts are affected by the July 15 FAR changes?

Existing contracts and orders with 18 months or more of remaining performance, including option periods, may be subject to review under the updated Part 16 requirements, particularly if they utilize other-than-fixed-price structures.

What is a repapering project?

Repapering is the process of updating, amending, restructuring, or replacing large numbers of existing agreements to meet new business, regulatory, contractual, or compliance requirements.

How can AI help with FAR compliance?

AI-powered contract lifecycle management software can automatically identify qualifying agreements, analyze contract metadata, route compliance workflows, support contract updates, and provide greater visibility across the entire contract portfolio.

avatar
Sean Heck
Sean Heck is Content Marketing Manager at CobbleStone Software. With over six years of experience in solving contract management challenges across industries and use cases, Heck is trusted by readers, contract management and legal ops professionals, thought leaders, and analysts alike.

Related Articles